United States v. Crawford

96 F. App'x 210
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 27, 2004
Docket03-50160
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 F. App'x 210 (United States v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Crawford, 96 F. App'x 210 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Donald Keith Crawford appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a jury trial, for 11 counts of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 2, and two counts of making false statements for the purpose of influencing the action of a financial institution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014.

Crawford challenges: the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him on four of the bank fraud counts; the district court’s refusal to grant a mistrial after the Government made allegedly improper statements during jury voir dire; the upward adjustment of Crawford’s sentence because he *211 was a leader or organizer of the scheme to defraud; the calculation of the amount of loss resulting from the fraudulent scheme as it affected his sentence; and the calculation of the restitution amount owed by Crawford to Security National Bank.

There is no reversible error, except for the restitution amount. Because Crawford should be credited with the amount he paid Security National Bank in their civil settlement, the restitution amount is reduced by $18,500. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to district court for entry of an amended judgment consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF AMENDED JUDGMENT

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawford v. United States
543 U.S. 1097 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Mitrione v. United States
543 U.S. 1097 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 F. App'x 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-crawford-ca5-2004.