United States v. Craig

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Craig

76 M.J. 64, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 18

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided January 17, 2017·No. No. 16-0650/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20150272. On further consideration of the granted issues, 75 M.J. 470 (C.A.A.F. 2016), the facts that the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals issued its judgment in Appellant’s case on May 10, 2016, and Appellate Military Judges Paulette V. Burton and James W. Herring were appointed by the President to the United States Court of Military Commission Review on May 25, 2016, and in light of United States v. Dalmazzi, 75 [65] M.J. 1 (C.A.A.F. 2016), it is ordered that the order issued October 20,2016, granting review is hereby vacated, and that Appellant’s petition for grant of review is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 20150272. On further consideration of the granted issues, 75 M.J. 470 (C.A.A.F. 2016), the facts that the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals issued its judgment in Appellant’s case on May 10, 2016, and Appellate Military Judges Paulette V. Burton and James W. Herring were appointed by the President to the United States Court of Military Commission Review on May 25, 2016, and in light of United States v. Dalmazzi, 75 [65] M.J. 1 (C.A.A.F. 2016), it is ordered that the order issued October 20,2016, granting review is hereby vacated, and that Appellant’s petition for grant of review is denied.

United States v. Craig, 76 M.J. 64, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 18 (Ark. 2017).

Pincite

76 M.J. 64 (United States v. Craig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.