United States v. Craig

76 M.J. 64, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 18
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 17, 2017
DocketNo. 16-0650/AR
StatusPublished

This text of 76 M.J. 64 (United States v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Craig, 76 M.J. 64, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 18 (Ark. 2017).

Opinion

CCA 20150272. On further consideration of the granted issues, 75 M.J. 470 (C.A.A.F. 2016), the facts that the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals issued its judgment in Appellant’s case on May 10, 2016, and Appellate Military Judges Paulette V. Burton and James W. Herring were appointed by the President to the United States Court of Military Commission Review on May 25, 2016, and in light of United States v. Dalmazzi, 75 [65]*65M.J. 1 (C.A.A.F. 2016), it is ordered that the order issued October 20,2016, granting review is hereby vacated, and that Appellant’s petition for grant of review is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 64, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-craig-armfor-2017.