United States v. Craig
This text of 76 M.J. 54 (United States v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CCA 20150272. On further consideration of the granted issues (Daily Journal, Oct. 20, 2016), it does not appear there is adequate evidence in the record demonstrating that Judge Herring and Judge Burton were appointed to the United States Court of Military Commission Review and sworn as judges of that court. Accordingly, it is ordered that within 10 days of the date of this Order, counsel for the parties shall file documentation with the Court relating to the appointments of Judges Herring and Burton to the United States Court of Military Commission Review, and establishing the date when they took the oath of office to execute the appointments.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 M.J. 54, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-craig-armfor-2016.