United States v. Craddock

143 F.3d 595, 1998 WL 213685
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMay 1, 1998
Docket95-1437
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 143 F.3d 595 (United States v. Craddock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Craddock, 143 F.3d 595, 1998 WL 213685 (10th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

143 F.3d 595w

81 A.F.T.R.2d 98-1769, 98-1 USTC P
50,392, 98 CJ C.A.R. 2152,
15 Colo. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 125

In re James Berry CRADDOCK, d/b/a Craddock Development Company, Debtor,
UNITED STATES of America, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
James Berry CRADDOCK, Debtor-Appellee.

No. 95-1437.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

May 1, 1998.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Craddock
149 F.3d 1249 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Craddock
149 F.3d 1249 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
Lemishow v. Commissioner
110 T.C. No. 26 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 F.3d 595, 1998 WL 213685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-craddock-ca10-1998.