United States v. Corpening

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 26, 2009
• Docket: 09-6486
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6486

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER CORPENING, a/k/a Michael Lewis Corpening, a/k/a Mike Boggie,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00037-RLV-DCK-7)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Christopher Corpening, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Christopher Corpening appeals the district

court’s order partially granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Corpening’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Corpening, No. 5:03-cr-00037-RLV-DCK-7 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED