United States v. Cooper
Opinion
Filed: April 18, 2002
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7924 (CR-92-108)
United States of America,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
Juanita Walker Cooper,
Defendant - Appellant.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed March 28, 2002, as follows:
On the cover sheet, section 3 -- the lower court information
is corrected to begin “Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston.”
On page 2, line 6 -- “S.D.W.Va.” is corrected to read “D.S.C.”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7924
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-108)
Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juanita Walker Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Juanita Walker Cooper appeals from the district court’s order
denying her motions to modify her term of imprisonment and to
dismiss the indictment and her conviction. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Cooper, No. CR-92-108 (D.S.C. Oct. 25,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Cooper (United States v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.