United States v. Cooper

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cooper. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 F. App'x 115
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2000·No. 00-6198·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6198

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BOBBY LYNN COOPER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-49-B, CA-96-82-7-R/B)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 31, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Lynn Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bobby Lynn Cooper seeks to appeal the district court’s denial

of his motion to vacate a prior order denying relief on his motion

filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Cooper, Nos. CR-90-49-B; CA-96-82-7-R/B (W.D. Va.

Jan. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cooper, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Cooper (United States v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related