United States v. Continental Can Co.
375 U.S. 893, 84 S. Ct. 173, 11 L. Ed. 2d 123, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 355
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 28, 1963
DocketNo. 367
StatusPublished
Cited by73 cases
This text of 375 U.S. 893 (United States v. Continental Can Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Continental Can Co., 375 U.S. 893, 84 S. Ct. 173, 11 L. Ed. 2d 123, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 355 (1963).
Opinion
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dyson v. State
615 A.2d 1182 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1992)
Texas Commerce Bank, N.A. v. United Savings Ass'n of Texas
789 F. Supp. 848 (S.D. Texas, 1992)
In re the Dependency & Neglect of C.L.
397 N.W.2d 81 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1986)
Matter of CL
397 N.W.2d 81 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1986)
United States v. Assada Abou-Saada, United States of America v. Milad K. El-Debeib, United States of America v. Antonious Tannous, United States of America v. Yacoub Fayad
785 F.2d 1 (First Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Abou-Saada
785 F.2d 1 (First Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Rita M. Lavelle
751 F.2d 1266 (D.C. Circuit, 1985)
State v. Morales
460 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Tresvant v. State
396 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
United States v. Luz-Estella Alvarez-Porras, Jose Garcia-Perez, and Roberto Colon-Diaz
643 F.2d 54 (Second Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Mary Sue Hubbard, United States of America v. Mary Sue Hubbard Church of Scientology of California, Church of Scientology of California v. United States of America
650 F.2d 293 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Hubbard
650 F.2d 293 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
United States v. James A. Brien, United States of America v. Thomas Labus, United States of America v. Robert Ralph Zolla, United States of America v. Michael Shuster, United States of America v. Stephen Buzzi
617 F.2d 299 (First Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Brien
617 F.2d 299 (First Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Joseph R. Jackson
627 F.2d 1198 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne Whitmore
590 F.2d 575 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
State v. Atkins
377 A.2d 718 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Brown v. Moore
428 F. Supp. 1123 (S.D. Alabama, 1976)
United States v. Daniel Jordano
521 F.2d 695 (Second Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Judy Sorota
515 F.2d 573 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
375 U.S. 893, 84 S. Ct. 173, 11 L. Ed. 2d 123, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-continental-can-co-scotus-1963.