United States v. Connor

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

THOMAS NELSON CONNOR,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:01-cr-00008-RLV-9)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claire J. Rauscher, Federal Public Defender, Charlotte, North Carolina, Matthew Segal, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Nelson Connor appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny Connor’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Connor, No. 5:01-cr-00008-RLV-9 (W.D.N.C. July 30, 2008). See

United States v. Hood, ___ F.3d ___, 2009 WL 416979 (4th Cir.

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED