United States v. Coleman
Opinion
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Russell Kenton Coleman has [996]*996moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Coleman has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Coleman’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Coleman’s motion to proceed pro se on appeal is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
397 F. App'x 995 (United States v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.