United States v. Coleman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 609 F.3d 699
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2010·No. 08-41325·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 08-41325 Document: 00511270077 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2010

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 21, 2010 No. 08-41325 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RUSSELL KENTON COLEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CR-57-ALL

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Russell Kenton Coleman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Coleman has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Coleman’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 08-41325 Document: 00511270077 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2010 No. 08-41325

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. Coleman’s motion to proceed pro se on appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Coleman, (5th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Coleman (United States v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)