Home/Fourth Circuit/United States v. Coleman

United States v. Coleman

42 F. App'x 661
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 F. App'x 91 →
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2002·No. No. 02-6751·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark Coleman appeals the district court’s order disposing of several post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Coleman, No. CR-96-325 (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [662]*662and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Coleman, 42 F. App'x 661 (4th Cir. 2002).

42 F. App'x 661 (United States v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.