United States v. Coleman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6751

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARK F. COLEMAN, a/k/a Mark Coleman, a/k/a Mark V. Johnson, a/k/a Wakim, a/k/a Y-Kim, a/k/a Mark Coleman,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-325)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 20, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark F. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Mark Coleman appeals the district court’s order disposing of

several post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Coleman, No. CR-96-325 (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2002). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED