United States v. Cole
This text of 521 F. App'x 266 (United States v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[267]*267Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
James Issac Cole, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). As we have recognized, however, a district court has no authority to grant a motion to reconsider its previous order denying a 3582(c) motion. United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
521 F. App'x 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cole-ca4-2013.