United States v. Cole

521 F. App'x 266
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2013·No. No. 13-6372·Published

Opinion

[267] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Issac Cole, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). As we have recognized, however, a district court has no authority to grant a motion to reconsider its previous order denying a 3582(c) motion. United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cole, 521 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2013).

521 F. App'x 266 (United States v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)