United States v. Cole

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cole. Read the opinion of the Court — 631 F.3d 146
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2009·No. 08-8399·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8399

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAWLE ANTHONY COLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (0:98-cr-01126-JFA-1)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rawle Anthony Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rawle Anthony Cole appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Cole, No. 0:98-cr-01126-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cole, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Cole (United States v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related