United States v. Clyde Anderson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 31, 2023
Docket22-7386
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Clyde Anderson (United States v. Clyde Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Clyde Anderson, (4th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7386 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7386

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLYDE WAYNE ANDERSON, a/k/a Buck,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00474-FL-1)

Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: August 31, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clyde Wayne Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Paige O’Hale, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7386 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Clyde Wayne Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse of

discretion in the district court’s denial of Anderson’s motion. See United States v. High,

997 F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. * United States v. Anderson, No. 5:18-cr-00474-FL-1 (E.D.N.C.

Nov. 3, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We decline to address the issues Anderson raises for the first time on appeal regarding the validity of his career offender status and the health of his son’s caretaker. United States v. Herrera-Pagoada, 14 F.4th 311, 318 (4th Cir. 2021).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Anthony High
997 F.3d 181 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Lexy Herrera-Pagoada
14 F.4th 311 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Clyde Anderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clyde-anderson-ca4-2023.