United States v. Clyburn

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2009·No. 09-7678·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7678

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRINITY JAQUEY CLYBURN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cr-01299-TLW-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Trinity Jaquey Clyburn, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Trinity Jaquey Clyburn appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Clyburn, No. 4:05-cr-01299-TLW-1 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 24, 2009 &

entered Aug. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clyburn, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Clyburn (United States v. Clyburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related