United States v. Clifford D. Lewis
This text of 448 F.2d 788 (United States v. Clifford D. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction in this case of theft from the United States mail is affirmed.
The trial courts made several close rulings in Miranda, 1 Griffin v. California, 2 and Jackson v. Denno 3 areas. If error, it was not aggravated.
We find the properly admissible evidence was so overwhelming that Chapman 4 and Harrington 5 indicate the conviction should be affirmed. However, the procedure here followed in inquiring into admissions would result, under Jackson v. Denno, in a reversal in a close ease.
We find the issue about the trial court’s response to a question of the jury not well taken.
. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
. Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965).
. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964).
. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1966).
. Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 F.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clifford-d-lewis-ca9-1971.