United States v. Cleveland

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 18, 2005
• Docket: 05-6662
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6662

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TROY V. CLEVELAND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-93-402; CA-99-1030)

Submitted: September 30, 2005 Decided: October 18, 2005

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy V. Cleveland, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Troy V. Cleveland appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion construed as a request for

reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).* We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Cleveland, Nos. CR-93-402; CA-99-1030 (E.D. Va. Apr. 7,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The motion was styled “‘Ends of Justice’ Motion Pursuant to the All Writs Act Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)” and “request[ed] reconsideration” of the denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

- 2 -