United States v. Clements

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 23, 2009
• Docket: 08-8339
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8339

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOHN WILLIAM CLEMENTS, a/k/a Bam, a/k/a Greg Dion, a/k/a John Harmon,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (2:99-cr-00198-4)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John William Clements, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John William Clements appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Clements, No. 2:99-cr-00198-4 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 20, 2008); see

also United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 252-56 (4th Cir.

2009), petition for cert. filed, Mar. 20, 2009 (No. 08-1185).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED