United States v. Clay

677 F.3d 753, 2012 WL 1345833, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7873
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 19, 2012·No. 09-5568·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having [754]*754been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clay, 677 F.3d 753, 2012 WL 1345833, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7873 (6th Cir. 2012).

677 F.3d 753 (United States v. Clay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Brashard Gibbs
797 F.3d 416 (Sixth Circuit, 2015)
Gordon v. State
66 A.3d 647 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2013)
United States v. Clay
677 F.3d 753 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)