United States v. Claude Simpson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7752
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLAUDE SIMPSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Donald C. Coggins, District Judge. (7:18-cr-00291-DCC-1)
Submitted: February 7, 2022 Decided: February 18, 2022
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claude Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Winston Irwin Marosek, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Claude Simpson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Simpson, No. 7:18-cr-00291-DCC-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2020).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Claude Simpson (United States v. Claude Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.