United States v. Clarke

51 F. App'x 472

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Keithroy Noel Clarke seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Clarke has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Clarke, Nos. CR-97-166; CA-01-738-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 29, 2002; entered May 30, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.