United States v. Clark

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 193 F.3d 845
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2002·No. 01-40223·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40223 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

CORY CASHAWN CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-41-3 -------------------- April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Cory Cashawn Clark has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California.1 Clark was provided with a copy of counsel’s Anders

motion and brief and has filed a response. Our independent

review of the record, Clark’s response, and counsel’s brief shows

that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal

is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clark, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Clark (United States v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)