United States v. Clark
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50974 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CODY LEE CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-00-CR-21-1 -------------------- August 14, 2001
Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Cody Lee Clark has requested
leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Clark did not file a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the
appeal is DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Clark (United States v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.