United States v. Clark

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 67 F.3d 1154
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 28, 1997·No. 97-40362·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40362 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE BARRY CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:96-CR-15-ALL - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

George Barry Clark appeals his sentence for conspiring to

defraud the United States by obtaining fraudulent income tax

refunds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 286. He contends it was

error for the district court to assess a four-level enhancement

for his leadership role, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a), when

calculating his sentence. The presentence report supports the

determination that Clark was a § 3B1.1 leader or organizer. The

district court did not clearly err in assessing the four-level

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-40362 -2-

enhancement. See United States v. Ronning, 47 F.3d 710, 711 (5th

Cir. 1995); United States v. Gadison, 8 F.3d 186, 196 (5th Cir.

1993).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clark, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Clark (United States v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Gadison
8 F.3d 186 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Ronning
47 F.3d 710 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)