United States v. Clark

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 67 F.3d 1154
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 28, 1997·No. 93-9081·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

No. 93-9081.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Loreta De-Ann COFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

April 10, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Robert B. Maloney, Judge.

Prior report: --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 40, 136 L.Ed.2d 3.

Before GARWOOD, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

The Supreme Court of the United States vacated this Court's previous order as to Loreta De-

Ann Coffman, see United States v. Clark, 67 F.3d 1154 (5th Cir.1995), and remanded it for further

consideration in light of Bailey v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472

(1996).

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of appellant, Loreta De-Ann Coffman, to summarily

reverse, vacate, and remand for resentencing is GRANTED. Loreta De-Ann Coffman's conviction

for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) is REVERSED, her sentence is VACATED, and this case is

REMANDED to the district court for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clark, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Clark (United States v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Clark
67 F.3d 1154 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
Bailey v. United States
516 U.S. 137 (Supreme Court, 1995)