United States v. Clark
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
No. 93-9081.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Loreta De-Ann COFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
April 10, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Robert B. Maloney, Judge.
Prior report: --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 40, 136 L.Ed.2d 3.
Before GARWOOD, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
The Supreme Court of the United States vacated this Court's previous order as to Loreta De-
Ann Coffman, see United States v. Clark, 67 F.3d 1154 (5th Cir.1995), and remanded it for further
consideration in light of Bailey v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472
(1996).
IT IS ORDERED that the motion of appellant, Loreta De-Ann Coffman, to summarily
reverse, vacate, and remand for resentencing is GRANTED. Loreta De-Ann Coffman's conviction
for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) is REVERSED, her sentence is VACATED, and this case is
REMANDED to the district court for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Clark (United States v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.