United States v. Clarence Coakley

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 20, 2016
• Docket: 16-7165
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7165

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE D. COAKLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00026-BO-1)

Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.

Clarence D. Coakley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Coakley appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d

183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) (“[A] defendant who was convicted of a

crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory

minimum sentence is ineligible for a reduction under

§ 3582(c)(2).”). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED