United States v. Christopher Rogers

598 F. App'x 188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 2015
Docket14-4767
StatusUnpublished

This text of 598 F. App'x 188 (United States v. Christopher Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Christopher Rogers, 598 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In accordance with a written plea agreement, Christopher Ray-Bryan Rogers pled *189 guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2012). Rogers was sentenced as an armed career criminal to 200 months in prison. He now appeals, claiming that the district court erred when it increased his term of imprisonment based upon prior convictions that were neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury. Rogers concedes, however, that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). We are “bound by Almendarez-Torres unless and until the Supreme Court says otherwise.” United States v. Graham, 711 F.3d 445, 455 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 449, 187 L.Ed.2d 300 (2013). The Supreme Court has not overruled Almenda-rez-Torres.

We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. William Graham
711 F.3d 445 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
598 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-christopher-rogers-ca4-2015.