United States v. Christopher A Welker

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 16, 2005
Docket04-3535
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Christopher A Welker (United States v. Christopher A Welker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Christopher A Welker, (8th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 04-3535 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Christopher A. Welker, * * Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: April 11, 2005 Filed: May 16, 2005 ___________

Before COLLOTON, McMILLIAN, BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

After admitting to stealing seven firearms, Christopher Andrew Welker pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court1 enhanced Welker's sentence based on the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 (ACCA) of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). He appeals the enhancement, arguing that the district court violated Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. ---, 124 S.Ct. 2531

1 The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. (2004) by "finding" that his three prior burglary convictions were violent felonies. This court reviews de novo whether a prior offense is a violent felony under section 924(e). United States v. Abernathy, 277 F.3d 1048, 1051 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1089 (2002). Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

The ACCA mandates a minimum15-year sentence for a violation of section 922(g)(1) when the person has three or more convictions for a "violent felony." 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). A prior conviction is a sentencing factor for the court. Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 243-44 (1998). Whether a prior conviction is a violent felony is a question of law for the court, not an issue submitted to a jury. United States v. Sanders, 377 F.3d 845, 847 n.3 (8th Cir. 2004). Therefore, a court does not engage in prohibited fact-finding when enhancing sentences under the ACCA for prior convictions. See United States v. Painter, 400 F.3d 1111, 1111 (8th Cir. 2005).

This court has held repeatedly that a burglary conviction is a violent felony. United States v. Nolan, 397 F.3d 665, 666 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Blahowski, 324 F.3d 592, 594-95 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 934 (2003); United States v. Hascall, 76 F.3d 902, 904 (8th Cir. 1996). Moreover, section 924(e) includes burglary in the definition of violent felony. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). Because Welker had three burglary convictions, the district court did not err in enhancing his sentence under the ACCA.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

_____________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Ricky Lee Hascall
76 F.3d 902 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Gary Abernathy
277 F.3d 1048 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Robert Allen Sanders
377 F.3d 845 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Melvin Nolan
397 F.3d 665 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. LARRY B. PAINTER, —
400 F.3d 1111 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Christopher A Welker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-christopher-a-welker-ca8-2005.