United States v. Child
This text of 167 F. App'x 666 (United States v. Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Otto Bear Child appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging the 220-month sentence imposed following a jury trial conviction for abusive sexual contact, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c) and 1153. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(a). We review de novo, United States v. Day, 285 F.3d 1167, 1169 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.
The issue of whether Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), are retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review is foreclosed by United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir.2005). The district court therefore properly denied the § 2255 motion.
AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 F. App'x 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-child-ca9-2006.