United States v. Chikaka
This text of 76 M.J. 170 (United States v. Chikaka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CCA 201400251. On consideration of Appellee’s motion to strike Appellant’s brief, motion to strike pages from the joint appendix, motion for exception to the rule, motion to correct errata, corrected motion to strike Appellant’s brief, and corrected motion to strike pages from the joint appendix, it is ordered that Appellee’s motions to correct errata and for exception to the rule, are hereby granted; Appellee’s corrected motion to strike pages from the joint appendix and corrected motion to strike Appellant’s brief are hereby denied; and Appellee’s motions to strike pages from the joint appendix and to strike Appellant’s brief are hereby denied as moot.
Judge Ryan did not participate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 M.J. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chikaka-armfor-2017.