United States v. Chestnut

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Chestnut

534 F. App'x 189

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 22, 2013·No. No. 13-6197·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Chestnut’s motions to seal and for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [190] the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Chestnut’s motions to seal and for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [190] the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Chestnut, 534 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

534 F. App'x 189 (United States v. Chestnut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related