United States v. Cheese

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cheese. Read the opinion of the Court — 384 F. App'x 245
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2010·No. 09-6923·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6923

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALFRED CHEESE, a/k/a Big Cheese,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-7535

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:98-cr-00259-BEL-2)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 23, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Cheese, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Alfred Cheese appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) and his subsequent motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Cheese, No. 1:98-cr-

00259-BEL-2 (D. Md. Mar. 25, 2009 & July 28, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cheese, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Cheese (United States v. Cheese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related