United States v. Chavis
This text of 547 F. App'x 355 (United States v. Chavis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Haywood Lee Chavis, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Chavis, No. 4:04-cr-00087-WDK-JEB-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 25, 2013; entered June 26, 2013). We deny Chavis’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
547 F. App'x 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-chavis-ca4-2013.