United States v. Chavez-Ortega

8 F. App'x 709
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 19, 2001·No. No. 00-10365; D.C. No. CR-99-00459-PMP·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Ramon Juan Chavez-Ortega appeals the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to reentry of a deported alien. Chavez-Ortega contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), a prior felony is an element of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) which must be pled in the indictment, and that failure to do so renders a sentence in excess of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)’s statutory maximum illegal. Chavez-Ortega also contends that Apprendi renders Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), inapplicable to this case because Chavez-Ortega did not admit to an aggravated felony at his plea hearing. These arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir. 2000), amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order).

The sentence is AFFIRMED. This matter is REMANDED to the district court with directions to correct the judgment of conviction to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), consistent wdth United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir.2000). See United States v. Herrera-Bianco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chavez-Ortega, 8 F. App'x 709 (9th Cir. 2001).

8 F. App'x 709 (United States v. Chavez-Ortega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Pablo Rivera-Sanchez
222 F.3d 1057 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Juan Carlos Herrera-Blanco
232 F.3d 715 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda
234 F.3d 411 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)