United States v. Charles McIntosh

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided August 28, 2012·No. 19-2037·Unpublished

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted August 23, 2012 Decided August 28, 2012

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 12‐2286

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Court Plaintiff‐Appellee, for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

v. No. 1:07‐cr‐00073‐WCG‐1

CHARLES T. McINTOSH, William C. Griesbach, Defendant‐Appellant. Judge.

O R D E R

We have considered the Anders brief submitted by the attorney for the defendant‐ appellant, Charles T. McIntosh. The brief is sufficient on its face and we agree that there are no non‐frivolous grounds for appeal. The motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Charles McIntosh, (7th Cir. 2012).

United States v. Charles McIntosh (United States v. Charles McIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.