United States v. Charles A. Williams

188 U.S. 485, 23 S. Ct. 363
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 26, 1903·No. 59·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

188 U.S. 485

23 S.Ct. 363

47 L.Ed. 554

UNITED STATES
v.
CHARLES A. WILLIAMS et al.

No. 59.

Argued October 30, 31, 1902.

Ordered for reargument December 22, 1902.

Reargued January 9, 1903.

Decided January 26, 1903.

Mr. Robert A. Howard, and Solicitor General Richards for United states.

Messrs. Julian Mitchell, Jr., Henry A. M. Smith, and Julian Mitchell for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

This case is in all substantial respects similar to the one just decided [United States v. Lynah, 187 U. S. —, ante, 349, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 349], and for the reasons given in the opinion therein the judgment is affirmed.

For the reason stated in their dissenting opinion in the prior case, the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent also in this case.

Mr. Justice McKenna took no part in the decision of these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Charles A. Williams, 188 U.S. 485, 23 S. Ct. 363 (1903).

188 U.S. 485 (United States v. Charles A. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of Transportation
304 S.E.2d 164 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1983)
State v. Hardee
193 S.E.2d 497 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1972)
Rank v. Krug
90 F. Supp. 773 (S.D. California, 1950)
United States v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.
113 F.2d 919 (Eighth Circuit, 1940)
Sponenbarger v. United States
21 F. Supp. 28 (E.D. Arkansas, 1937)
Morrell v. United States
57 Ct. Cl. 379 (Court of Claims, 1922)
Heyward v. United States
52 Ct. Cl. 87 (Court of Claims, 1917)