United States v. Chappell

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 14, 2009
• Docket: 08-6736
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6736

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DUALA CHAPPELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (3:95-cr-00017-3-SGW)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 14, 2009

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duala Chappell, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Bartlett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Duala Chappell appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Chappell, No. 3:95-cr-00017-3-SGW (W.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2009). We

deny Chappell’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED