United States v. Chapman
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Shirley Marie Chapman appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and reducing her sentence to 57 months’ imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United States v. Chapman, No. 3:06-cr-00007-JPB-1 (N.D.W.Va. May 28, 2008), and in our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We also deny Chapman’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
320 F. App'x 184 (United States v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.