United States v. Chapman

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 25, 2005
• Docket: 05-6047
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6047

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LARRY CHAPMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-209)

Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 25, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Frank McDonald, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, W. Walter Wilkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Larry Chapman appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for production of documents. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave

to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.* See United States v. Chapman, No. CR-99-209

(D.S.C. Oct. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We decline to address the issue with respect to United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), as Chapman raises it for the first time in his informal brief and it is inapplicable to his case.

- 2 -