United States v. Chambers, Deondery
Opinion
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
April 7, 2009
Before
RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge
DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge
No. 06‐2405
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Illinois. v. No. 4:05‐cr‐40444‐JLF DEONDERY CHAMBERS, Defendant‐Appellant. G. Patrick Murphy, Judge.
O R D E R
Upon consideration of the statements of position submitted by the parties in this case, which has been remanded to this court by the Supreme Court, Chambers v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 687 (2009). we remand this case to the district court for resentencing of the defendant in accordance with the Supreme Courtʹs decision and the procedures set forth in Nelson v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 890 (2009); Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586 (2007), and Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558 (2007), which allow a defendant in a resentencing proceeding to raise a new argument based on statutes or judicial decisions that postdate his original sentencing, provided they are not foreclosed by the decision in his appeal from his original, vacated sentence,
So Ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Chambers, Deondery (United States v. Chambers, Deondery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.