United States v. Chambers
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7248
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GEORGE CHAMBERS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:94-cr-00089-JRS-1)
Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: August 12, 2009
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
George Chambers appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Chambers, No. 3:94-
cr-00089-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Chambers (United States v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.