United States v. Chambers

80 F. App'x 814
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Chambers. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 F. App'x 140
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 10, 2003·No. 03-7088·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

George Chambers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Chambers, No. CR-94-89 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chambers, 80 F. App'x 814 (4th Cir. 2003).

80 F. App'x 814 (United States v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related