United States v. Chambers

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Chambers. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 F. App'x 140
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 1999·No. 99-6252·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6252

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEROY R. CHAMBERS, a/k/a Reggie Williams,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-13-BO, CA-98-28-4-BO)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy R. Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Leroy A. Chambers seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Chambers, Nos. CR-95-13-BO; CA-98-28-

4-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 1999). We dispense with oral argument be-

cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chambers, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Chambers (United States v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related