United States v. Chambers

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Chambers. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 F. App'x 140
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 1999·No. 98-7444·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7444

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANNE MARIE CHAMBERS, a/k/a Sugar, a/k/a Anne Marie Jack,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-94-89, CA-97-755)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 9, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anne Marie Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Anne Marie Chambers seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Chambers, Nos. CR-94-

89; CA-97-755 (E.D. Va. Sept. 3, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion

for general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chambers, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Chambers (United States v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related