United States v. Chadoyan

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Chadoyan

329 F. App'x 510

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2009·No. No. 09-6177·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sarkis Chadoyan filed a motion in the district court for reduction of sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). The district court docketed the motion as an appeal from the denial of Chadoyan’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion. Because our review of the record convinces us that the document was incorrectly docketed, we dismiss the appeal and remand to the district court for consideration of Chadoyan’s Rule 35 motion on the merits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sarkis Chadoyan filed a motion in the district court for reduction of sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). The district court docketed the motion as an appeal from the denial of Chadoyan’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion. Because our review of the record convinces us that the document was incorrectly docketed, we dismiss the appeal and remand to the district court for consideration of Chadoyan’s Rule 35 motion on the merits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED.

United States v. Chadoyan, 329 F. App'x 510 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

329 F. App'x 510 (United States v. Chadoyan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related