United States v. Cepeda

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6320

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FAUSTO CEPEDA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:93-cr-00128-JRS-1)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fausto Cepeda, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Fausto Cepeda appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based on the

amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Cepeda, No. 3:93-cr-00128-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 9,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED