United States v. Ceja-Lugo
This text of 68 F. App'x 45 (United States v. Ceja-Lugo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Adan Ceja-Lugo appeals his conviction and 55-month sentence imposed following his unconditional guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Ceja-Lugo entered into a negotiated plea agreement in which he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal or collaterally attack his conviction and sentence. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir. 2000) (recognizing that courts will enforce waiver of appeal rights when waiver is knowing and voluntary).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 F. App'x 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ceja-lugo-ca9-2003.