United States v. Cazaco
This text of United States v. Cazaco (United States v. Cazaco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7753
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LEONEL R. CAZACO, a/k/a Scott, a/k/a James Romeo Nelson, a/k/a Frank Nisbett, a/k/a Jimmy Fingers,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-96-66, CA-01-659)
Submitted: March 17, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonel R. Cazaco, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, David John Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Leonel R. Cazaco seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cazaco
has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. ,
2003 WL 431659, at *10 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662).
Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability,
deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss
the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Cazaco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cazaco-ca4-2003.